← Search

Rob Acevedo

Salt Lake City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 85W–58L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rob Acevedo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history143 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Liberty Park-Nilson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Craig Hendrix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-19 · Liberty Park-Nilson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bob Maxfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-18 · Liberty Park-Nilson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anthony Delgado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · Sports Mall-Vos/Isaza · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Arunnatesh Muthukkumaraswamy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Don Droubay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-15 · Workout Boys · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Steve Albert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-02 · Sports Mall-Vos/Isaza · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Lebrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · Workout Boys · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jon Penman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-27 · Workout Boys · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with George Lukes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-20 · Workout Boys · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Paul Dunford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · Workout Boys · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Steve Albert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-06 · Workout Boys · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Steve Albert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
81.1%
43W–10L · 60.7% of games
4.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 42.1% of games
8.0
57.7%
15W–11L · 52% of games
9.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.3% of games
8.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.7% of games
9.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 40.7% of games
9.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
44 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert