← Search

Cameron Iraj

Harrison, NY
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 56W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cameron Iraj to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
W
2026-08-13 · Chestnut Ridge - 55+ 9.0 M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Marc Lowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Robert Moynihan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Robert Moynihan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-16 · Chestnut Ridge - 55+ 9.0 M · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrew Canning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-04-16 · Metro: Lehman/Katz · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Isaac Osaki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-01 · Metro: Lehman/Katz · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Moynihan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-10-19 · Chestnut Ridge Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Kendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-01-26 · Metro: Lehman/Katz · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Grenert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2024-09-27 · CP: Chelsea Piers Men's 4.5 40+: Pascale · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Finn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
Brett Wehrum / Scott Smith
2024-08-11 · #2 Doubles · with Alex Zilberman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-08-11 · #1 Doubles · with Alex Zilberman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2024-08-10 · #3 Doubles · with Alex Zilberman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
66.7%
32W–16L · 57.3% of games
5.0
40%
2W–3L · 42.7% of games
9.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 49.6% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 59.6% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 35.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer