← Search

Marc Lowitz

— year-end
196 matches · 131W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marc Lowitz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history196 matches
L
Patrick O'Toole / Adam Lewczuk
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Mark Schlecker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Sean Brawley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Mark Schlecker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Mark Schlecker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · Chestnut Ridge - 55+ 9.0 M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cameron Iraj
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Robert Reby championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
Todd Green / Jason Palleschi
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Robert Reby championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-08 · Southern: CRRC 18+ 4.5M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Schlecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-06 · Southern: CRRC Load Management 40+ 4.5M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brendan Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · with Wulf Lueckerath championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Wulf Lueckerath championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-24 · Southern: CRRC 18+ 4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Lerner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
80.5%
62W–15L · 61.9% of games
5.0
55%
11W–9L · 53% of games
9.0
90.5%
19W–2L · 65.9% of games
10.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 39.2% of games
8.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 44% of games
9.0mixed
75%
15W–5L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
121 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
26 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe