← Search

Jeffrey Cempre

Worthington, OH
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 46W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Cempre to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
L
2026-05-16 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Colin Leveque
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-24 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Ramsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-3
W
2026-04-18 · Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dale Wynkoop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-10 · Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Ramsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-28 · Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Charles Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-27 · Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Ramsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-03-22 · Racquet Club/Scarborough · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Roush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-15 · Racquet Club/Scarborough · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with James MacKey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-21 · Wickertree · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Casey Cempre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-10-03 · Wickertree · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Casey Cempre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-05-18 · Racquet Club/Scarborough · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dale Wynkoop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-05-02 · Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sid Couling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
38.6%
34W–54L · 46.1% of games
5.0
50%
3W–3L · 49.6% of games
8.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 54.1% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
23 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer