← Search

Andrew Lorms

Upper Arlington, OH
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
42 matches · 23W–19L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrew Lorms to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
L
2026-03-27 · The Players Club · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cort Bradbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-03-28 · The Players Club · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Birzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-03-16 · The Player's Club · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2021-05-02 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2021-04-25 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2021-04-18 · Olympic 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brad Underwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2021-04-11 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2021-03-21 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brad Underwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2021-02-27 · Olympic 1 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Jacques Duperre / Lu Gao
2021-01-23 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with JR Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2021-01-16 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with JR Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2021-01-10 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ted Sun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
56.4%
22W–17L · 53.8% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#2 Singles
14%
6 matches
#1 Singles
10%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert