← Search

Nancy Hallowell

— year-end
185 matches · 129W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nancy Hallowell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history185 matches
L
2026-08-22 · WP GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Almanza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
Christine Johnson / Brad Webb
2026-08-09 · WP GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Almanza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Boes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-05 · SS-H ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Beblavi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eden Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-22 · SS-H ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angie Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-19 · WP GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Almanza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-16 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-14 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Abalos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-12 · WP GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Almanza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · SS-H ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angie Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-07 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Boes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
69.4%
68W–30L · 58.7% of games
8.0
84.1%
37W–7L · 60.4% of games
9.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.3% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 52.5% of games
8.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 51.8% of games
8.5mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
78 matches
#1 Singles
24%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
22 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer