← Search

Eden Parker

Aurora, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
220 matches · 140W–80L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eden Parker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history220 matches
W
2026-09-03 · CACM ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-27 · CACM ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-08-23 · WP GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Hallowell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · CACM YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rick Lannon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
Lisa Miller / Laura Steeby
2026-08-13 · CACM ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-09 · WP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Hallowell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · CACM ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Cuevas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · WP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bruce Silver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-02 · CACM YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rick Lannon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-30 · CACM NAVY · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-30 · CACM ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Jensik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · CACM YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brad Webb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.7% of games
3.0
52.2%
36W–33L · 51.4% of games
3.5
74.4%
32W–11L · 56.3% of games
4.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 52.9% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 61.6% of games
6.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 58.5% of games
6.5mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 56.7% of games
7.0mixed
61.5%
16W–10L · 57% of games
7.5mixed
50%
5W–5L · 53.4% of games
8.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 58.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
104 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
42 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
11 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King