← Search

David Reynoldson

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 9W–16L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add David Reynoldson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
W
2026-09-13 · MAC-Siegel · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Daniel Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Daniel Larsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Daniel Larsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Todd Siegel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Christopher Haddon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-03-15 · MAC-Austin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Siegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-22 · MAC-Austin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Haddon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-02-15 · MAC-Austin · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nathan Austin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-06 · MAC-Austin · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Siegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-01-04 · MAC-Austin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Haddon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-27 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bryan Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-23 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christopher Haddon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 43.4% of games
9.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer