← Search

Daniel Burns

Longview, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 14W–15L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Daniel Burns to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Toby Krauel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Thomas McGirk championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Toby Krauel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2025-10-03 · N OR-CAC-McGarity · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Thomas McGirk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-28 · N OR-CAC-McGarity · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Thomas McGirk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-06 · N OR-CAC-McGarity · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Thomas McGirk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2025-08-05 · Burns-The Net Prophets · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Simon Waite
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2025-07-26 · Burns-The Net Prophets · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Simon Waite
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-07-21 · Burns-The Net Prophets · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Toby Krauel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-12 · Burns-The Net Prophets · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jordan Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-22 · VTC-Burns/Krauel · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jordan Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-06-15 · VTC-Burns/Krauel · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jordan Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
47.8%
11W–12L · 53% of games
9.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King