← Search

Chaz Kuper

Omaha, NE
5.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 23W–23L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Chaz Kuper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2025-07-02 · Kuper · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Luke Backhaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-06-28 · Kuper · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Luke Backhaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2024-05-11 · Dombrowski/Veitzer · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Holly Christoffels mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
L
2024-04-19 · Dombrowski/Veitzer · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Denise Hazelrigg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-29 · Dombrowski/Veitzer · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Denise Hazelrigg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2024-03-08 · Dombrowski/Veitzer · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Holly Christoffels mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2023-08-09 · Marupudi/Allison · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Johnna Lowe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-07-08 · Slezak · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Fletcher Kuper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
Juan Rabellino / Clayton Bartelt
2023-06-24 · Slezak · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Fletcher Kuper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2023-06-10 · Slezak · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Joshua Raymond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2023-06-03 · Slezak · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kyle Krehbiel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Tracy Wright / Chris Foster
2023-06-03 · Slezak · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kyle Krehbiel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 51.1% of games
10.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 55.4% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams