← Search

Denise Hazelrigg

Omaha, NE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
197 matches · 98W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Denise Hazelrigg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history197 matches
W
Debra Adams / Natalie Simmonds
2026-09-09 · Da Club · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Christoffels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-26 · Da Club · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Kingston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-12 · Da Club · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Heard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Hazelrigg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Shefsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-23 · Hazelrigg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terri Fuxa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-18 · Holbrook · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah McGowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · Holbrook · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah McGowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-30 · Holbrook · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah McGowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Beth Stiles / Lisa Thomas
2026-05-26 · Hazelrigg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Christoffels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-19 · Hazelrigg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Christoffels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-05-15 · Tong · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Bernal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-14 · Holbrook · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah McGowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.2% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 35.3% of games
4.0
59.8%
58W–39L · 54.2% of games
4.5
9.1%
2W–20L · 36.4% of games
8.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 44.4% of games
8.0mixed
59%
23W–16L · 50.3% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
34 matches
#1 Singles
7%
14 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe