← Search

Nathan Narasimhan

— year-end
46 matches · 28W–18L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Nathan Narasimhan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
W
2026-07-01 · FCCC BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · FCCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Lillis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · FCCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Lillis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
Brian Smith / Adam Less
2026-06-10 · FCCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Lillis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-03 · FCCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christian Bachelet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-27 · FCCC WHITE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Gronewoller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-20 · FCCC WHITE · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-29 · FCCC WHITE · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-22 · FCCC WHITE · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-02 · FCCC BLACK · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Wick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-08-26 · FCCC BLACK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Hoeven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-19 · FCCC BLACK · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams12 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 61% of games
4.0
56.2%
18W–14L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
17 matches
#1 Singles
24%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
5 matches
#2 Singles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova