← Search

Ted Ray

— year-end
58 matches · 30W–28L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ted Ray to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
Robin Wick / Matthew Hoeven
2026-08-04 · LT SILVER · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David van Thuyne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · LT SILVER · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Corran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · HMTC BLACK · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Munoz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-25 · HMTC BLACK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · HMTC BLACK · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Munoz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · LT BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Bikos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-20 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Sundstedt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-13 · LT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Dale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-05-06 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
John Berkhausen / Christopher Jones
2026-04-29 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Baird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-22 · LT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Federico Pardina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
Jared Petersen / Brian Smith
2026-04-15 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Teams15 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
50.9%
28W–27L · 51.9% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer