← Search

Michael Neff

— year-end
83 matches · 37W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michael Neff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
L
2026-08-19 · PINE-Snell 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Maggie Knight mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-05 · PINE-Snell 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Maggie Knight mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-31 · PINE-Knight (outside) 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lauren Eaton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-28 · PINE-Kalil (inside) 55s 8.0M F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mahesh Lunani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-24 · PINE-Knight (outside) 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolyn Kennedy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · PINE-Zuchelli (inside) 40s 4.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Smolinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-3
L
2026-07-08 · PINE-Kalil (inside) 55s 8.0M F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dan Christ
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · PINE-Zuchelli (inside) 40s 4.0M F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Brand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · PINE-Kalil (inside) 55s 8.0M F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Harry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-22 · PINE-Zuchelli (inside) 40s 4.0M F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Brand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-18 · PINE-Zuchelli (inside) 40s 4.0M F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Brand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-12 · PINE-Knight (outside) 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Holman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
45.5%
10W–12L · 50.3% of games
8.0
50%
7W–7L · 56.1% of games
9.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
37.5%
9W–15L · 45.4% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
21 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams