← Search

Maggie Knight

— year-end
151 matches · 97W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Maggie Knight to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history151 matches
L
2026-08-19 · PINE-Snell 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michael Neff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-05 · PINE-Snell 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michael Neff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-31 · PINE-Knight (outside) 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Sarafa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-24 · PINE-Knight (outside) 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Peck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Snell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-13 · BT-Deen 40s 4.5 NW · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sali Refka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Gessner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-10 · PINE-Knight (outside) 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Sarafa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-08 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sali Refka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-06 · BT-Deen 40s 4.5 NW · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sali Refka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sali Refka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-04 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Gessner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
79.2%
57W–15L · 64.6% of games
4.5
44%
11W–14L · 49% of games
8.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 50.7% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
36 matches
#1 Singles
12%
18 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams