← Search

Greg Toman

Dayton, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
181 matches · 132W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Greg Toman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history181 matches
L
2026-08-23 · KTC-Gill · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rubinder Dab
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-30 · NWO 55&Over 8.0M Hoover -TTC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Friesen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-11 · NEO/Hoover/A65&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Latham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
John Schiller / Michael Levy
2026-06-27 · NEO/Hoover/A65&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pat Birney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-25 · NWO 55&Over 8.0M Hoover -TTC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Fargo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · KTC-Gill · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rubinder Dab
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-20 · NEO/Hoover/A65&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rich Frey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-05 · QRRC-Webb · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Raya Tabrah mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
Andrew Garofoli / John Bailey
2026-03-21 · QRRC-Taylor · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jansen Meyers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-20 · QRRC-Webb · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sonja Johannes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
Joseph Graham / Lucas Kulesza
2026-01-18 · QRRC-Taylor · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Haack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-01-03 · QRRC Taylor · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Ehlers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
80.3%
61W–15L · 61.9% of games
4.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 45.2% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.2% of games
8.0
81.2%
26W–6L · 60.8% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 48.7% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
22W–11L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
35 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe