← Search

Greg Haack

Dayton, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
244 matches · 151W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Greg Haack to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history244 matches
W
2026-08-30 · BCC-Hayden · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Philip Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · QRRC-Webb · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Sauer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-15 · KTC-Corbean · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lauren Keeley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cary Browne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cecil Mullins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-18 · KTC-Stevens · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelsey Cramer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Vidyashankar Revan / Damon Wick
2026-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cary Browne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-12 · QRRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Sauer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Dadaian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-21 · QRRC-Webb · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Sauer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · BCC-Hayden · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donald Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.6% of games
3.5
66.7%
44W–22L · 55.7% of games
4.0
51.9%
28W–26L · 51.1% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 59.2% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.9% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 47.6% of games
8.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 49.8% of games
6.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
72.4%
42W–16L · 58.4% of games
8.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
95 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
93 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
52 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe