← Search

Nancy Gravitt

— year-end
112 matches · 60W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nancy Gravitt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
W
2026-07-20 · NEGTA/Gloria Parr · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wanda Loggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-17 · Alberta Banks-Gravitt · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Peggy Kelso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-15 · City Park- Hermes · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Loggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-08 · City Park- Hermes · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Loggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · NEGTA/Gloria Parr · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wanda Loggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-29 · NEGTA/Gloria Parr · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Kelso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-24 · City Park- Hermes · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Loggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-22 · NEGTA/Gloria Parr · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Kelso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-19 · Alberta Banks-Gravitt · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Phyllis Case
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · City Park- Hermes · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Loggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-15 · NEGTA/Gloria Parr · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Mell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-12 · NEGTA/Gloria Parr · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wanda Loggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams52 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–6L · 32.1% of games
3.0
89.5%
17W–2L · 63.3% of games
3.5
65.2%
30W–16L · 55.8% of games
4.0
27.3%
9W–24L · 41.7% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 73.8% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 34.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer