← Search

Peggy Kelso

— year-end
44 matches · 17W–27L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Peggy Kelso to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
L
2026-07-17 · Alberta Banks-Gravitt · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nancy Gravitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-15 · City Park- Hermes · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Grobeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-06 · NEGTA/Gloria Parr · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gloria Parr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-01 · City Park- Hermes · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paula Fagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · NEGTA/Gloria Parr · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Gravitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-24 · City Park- Hermes · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Grobeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-06-22 · NEGTA/Gloria Parr · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Gravitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Gravitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leisa Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-18 · NEGTA/Nancy Gravitt · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Gravitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Gravitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-04 · NEGTA/Nancy Gravitt · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Gravitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Teams38 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 64% of games
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.6% of games
4.0
5.3%
1W–18L · 28.3% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer