← Search

Beth Loeb

Durham, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
282 matches · 124W–158L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beth Loeb to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history282 matches
L
2026-09-03 · KMabe.55.8.5C-HR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Geraldine Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Joan Kalnitsky / Lisa Watkins
2026-08-27 · KMabe.55.8.5C-HR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Geraldine Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-26 · KMabe-HR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anne Sherow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-15 · SFunkhouser.55C-HR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karin Yoch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-10 · KMabe-HR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tracy Fletcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-03 · KMabe-HR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Privalle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-27 · LPrivalle-HR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lance Long mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-13 · LPrivalle-HR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Lindblom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-15 · LPrivalle-HR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Niall Buckley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-04-29 · LPrivalle-HR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Sherow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-28 · JBarrow-HR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Stanek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-27 · GSmith-HR · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Barrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
52.5%
52W–47L · 50% of games
4.5
14.8%
4W–23L · 34.7% of games
7.5
48.6%
34W–36L · 49% of games
8.5
33.3%
15W–30L · 42% of games
4.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.3% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 28% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
109 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
92 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
81 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer