← Search

Vicky Arne

Pittsboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
406 matches · 255W–151L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Vicky Arne to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history406 matches
W
2026-09-14 · TOC.Arne · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Strong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-09-02 · ALeinbach.8.5C-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dayna Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-31 · Ta.LeFevre55C7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meghan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-28 · VArne-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meghan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · ALeinbach.7.5C-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christy Avery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-24 · TOC.Arne · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-21 · VArne-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Strong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-17 · TOC.Arne · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Strong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · VArne-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meghan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-10 · ALeinbach.8.5C-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dayna Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-08 · VArne-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dayna Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · JPerry-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Combs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams100 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 46% of games
4.0
72.4%
144W–55L · 59.3% of games
4.5
40%
6W–9L · 47% of games
7.5
68.4%
52W–24L · 59.3% of games
8.0
100%
5W–0L · 72% of games
8.5
56.5%
13W–10L · 53.8% of games
4.0mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 47% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 45.6% of games
8.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
150 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
139 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
104 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches
#3 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams