← Search

Brian Rowe

Earlysville, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 57W–29L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Brian Rowe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Logan Gruhl championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
Nathan Quan / Jake Stern
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Logan Gruhl championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-28 · Deep Run Kelly · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Laura Lafors mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-26 · WW Legends - Baker · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Richard Godsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · WW Legends - Baker · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Doug Bond championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Doug Bond championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-13 · Deep Run Kelly · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Laura Lafors mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-29 · Team Lieber · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · Deep Run Kelly · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Elizabeth Kelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · Deep Run Kelly · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Megan Alwine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · WW Legends - Baker · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paul Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
84%
21W–4L · 66.8% of games
5.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 57.3% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
63.6%
14W–8L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe