← Search

Logan Gruhl

Richmond, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
257 matches · 212W–45L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Logan Gruhl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history257 matches
W
2026-08-20 · Team Bader · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Naveen Chennupati
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Brian Rowe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
Nathan Quan / Jake Stern
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Brian Rowe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-03 · Team Bader · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Naveen Chennupati
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-30 · Team Bader · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Doug Bond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
William Coaty / Arun Mangalam
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Grant Slegowski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
Ben Hall
2026-07-11 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Naveen Chennupati championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · Team Lieber · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · Hermitage Slegowski · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Naveen Chennupati
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · Hermitage Slegowski · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Chenault V
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.5
86%
74W–12L · 63.3% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
80%
20W–5L · 65.1% of games
10.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 66.4% of games
7.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 65.2% of games
8.0mixed
86.7%
13W–2L · 67.2% of games
8.5mixed
86.4%
19W–3L · 64.2% of games
9.0mixed
82.6%
19W–4L · 63% of games
9.5mixed
94.1%
16W–1L · 64% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
122 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
46 matches
#1 Singles
8%
20 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova