← Search

Bruce Moore

Raleigh, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 67W–39L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Bruce Moore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
W
2026-08-30 · TOC.Adams · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dirk German
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · To.Larrichio55C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with W Troutman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-19 · TOC.Adams · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cliff Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · TOC.Adams · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with William Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-30 · Er.Rankin40M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tanya Parise mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
Casey Black / Karen Griffin
2026-06-18 · Er.Rankin40M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tanya Parise mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Chris Barcklow / Jeffrey Shuler
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · with Steve Faltz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
Kenny House / John Trimp
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · with Steve Faltz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-05-21 · Er.Rankin40M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tanya Parise mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-09 · MD.Moriarty · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tom Larrichio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-28 · Kr.Eriksson55A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Steve Faltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-25 · MD.Moriarty · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Krister Eriksson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
54.5%
18W–15L · 53.6% of games
5.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
82.6%
19W–4L · 59.9% of games
9.0
68%
17W–8L · 59.3% of games
9.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
19 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert