← Search

Boyd Blackburn

Chapel Hill, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
228 matches · 110W–118L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Boyd Blackburn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history228 matches
L
2026-09-08 · BBlackburn.55C-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with JOE BERTON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-29 · MHanauer-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Will Lassiter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-25 · BBlackburn.55C-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nathan Bearman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
William Adams / Cecil Turner
2026-08-22 · TOC.Verghese · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ghanshyamsinh Gohil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-22 · MHanauer-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nathan Bearman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-15 · TOC.Verghese · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Javier Burgos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-15 · MHanauer-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Reed Breneman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-4
L
2026-08-01 · MHanauer-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Henry Stiepel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · TOC.Perian · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sudhanshu Handa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-28 · Su.Handa55A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with W Troutman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
Jatinder Singh / Andrew Perdue
2026-04-25 · MHanauer-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Reed Breneman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-23 · Sa.Perian40A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Praveen Krishnamurthy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 58.3% of games
4.5
28.1%
18W–46L · 44.9% of games
8.5
53.1%
26W–23L · 53.6% of games
9.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.4% of games
8.0mixed
60.5%
26W–17L · 54.9% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
71 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
69 matches
#1 Singles
4%
10 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova