← Search

Sandra Bevilacqua-Kuhn

— year-end
18 matches · 10W–8L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Sandra Bevilacqua-Kuhn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
L
2026-08-15 · SPCC Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cristina Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-26 · SPCC Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Samantha Romasiewicz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-05-29 · HCC Tennis / J. Price · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deirdre West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-08 · HCC Tennis / J. Price · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Fernald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-02 · McMullen Oonk · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-11 · McMullen Oonk · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Fernald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-28 · McMullen West · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Fernald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-28 · McMullen West · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Fernald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-02-14 · McMullen West · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Teresa Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-07 · McMullen West · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Teresa Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · McMullen West · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Fernald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-08-13 · HCC Double Trouble - A. Flinter · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michele Ironsmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.8% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 64.8% of games
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
3 matches
#1 Singles
6%
1 match
#4 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer