← Search

Leticia Leppert

Tampa, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
320 matches · 217W–103L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Leticia Leppert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history320 matches
L
2026-08-16 · Arbor Greene LOVAS 18+ 7.5 Combo/Paul · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Silvia Srour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · Arbor Greene LOVAS 18+ 7.5 Combo/Paul · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sylvie Roy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-18 · #4 Doubles · with Karen Abrams championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Arbor Greene LOVAS 18+ 7.5 Combo/Paul · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Silvia Srour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · Davis Islands Mixed/SandraFreemanTennis/ A. Sheets · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rafael Pagan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-07 · Davis Islands Mixed/SandraFreemanTennis/ A. Sheets · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Monty Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Maria Suarez
2026-06-06 · PINELLAS/Abrams · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-30 · PINELLAS/Abrams · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Abrams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-26 · Arbor Green / C.Paul · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-23 · Arbor Green / C.Paul · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Bastian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 68% of games
4.0
67.9%
91W–43L · 57.1% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 60.2% of games
7.5
77.8%
35W–10L · 63.2% of games
8.0
87%
20W–3L · 57.3% of games
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 57.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
21W–21L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
109 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
97 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
67 matches
#1 Singles
8%
24 matches
#2 Singles
3%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert