← Search

Curt Andersen

Spokane, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 19W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Curt Andersen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Duke Dixon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-1
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with David Robin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-16 · PFC-Anderson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-05-15 · PFC-Anderson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carl Bruscoe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-11 · EW-Peak-Qualls · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Craig Fager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-10 · EW-Peak-Qualls · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Craig Fager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Joel Garrett / Jock Warde
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · with Kevin Tweed championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Bud Guion / Pete Fennell
2026-01-30 · #3 Doubles · with Craig Fager championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-02 · EW-PFC-Jones · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Duke Dixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-1
W
2025-11-01 · EW-PFC-Jones · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kevin Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
9-7
L
2025-06-22 · #3 Doubles · with Craig Fager championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Craig Fager championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.9% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 65% of the time
#3 Doubles
65%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe