← Search

Craig Fager

Hayden, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 14W–28L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Craig Fager to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Guy Schneider championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Glen Satre championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with John Williams championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · EW-Peak-Qualls · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Qualls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-04-11 · EW-Peak-Qualls · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Curt Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-10 · EW-Peak-Qualls · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Curt Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-10 · EW-Peak-Qualls · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Glen Satre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
Tony Martin / Hector Mendoza
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · with Kevin Tweed championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
Bud Guion / Pete Fennell
2026-01-30 · #3 Doubles · with Curt Andersen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Martin Tabbey / Courtland Jackson
2026-01-30 · #3 Doubles · with Kevin Tweed championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-02 · E.W.-Free Agents · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tim Qualls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-0
L
2025-11-01 · E.W.-Free Agents · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Cattell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-9
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.9% of games
9.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe