← Search

Cameron Wiley

HOLYOKE, MA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 23W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Cameron Wiley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-07-22 · BAY:Lewis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Hruska
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · BAY:Lewis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-14 · ETC:Enfield Smash:MCMANUS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Chassanoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-06 · HRH:Amherst Gents: Roche · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Seibert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-4
L
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · with Melissa Follansbee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Steven Mercier / Regina Morton
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · with Ann Kochis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
Lauryn Burridge / Anthony Wion
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · with Ann Kochis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melissa Follansbee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-24 · ETC:Mass Invasion:Schaffer/Lewis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Kochis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-11 · HRH:Amherst Gents: Roche · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-28 · HRH:Amherst Gents: Roche · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Hopkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · FV:Serve & Valley:Na/Sorensen · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cecily Wiswall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
57.7%
15W–11L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 54.8% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#1 Singles
14%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer