← Search

Rachel Epstein

— year-end
224 matches · 154W–70L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Rachel Epstein to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history224 matches
L
2026-06-20 · (Q) ETC:Summer Game Changers:Epstein/Schaffer · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marja Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · (Q) ETC:Summer Game Changers:Epstein/Schaffer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erica Bridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-03 · (Q) ETC:Summer Game Changers:Epstein/Schaffer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ashley Schaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-27 · (Q) ETC:Summer Game Changers:Epstein/Schaffer · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · BTC:More About That Ace:Song/Tysko · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Getler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-03 · ETC:Mass Invasion:Schaffer/Lewis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Curtis Hardaway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Palmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-04-11 · BTC:More About That Ace:Song/Tysko · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christine Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-04 · ETC:Game Changers:Epstein/Schaffer · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-21 · ETC:Game Changers:Epstein/Schaffer · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-03-15 · ETC:Mass Invasion:Schaffer/Lewis · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Curtis Hardaway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
Teams55 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 62.1% of games
4.0
79%
94W–25L · 61.3% of games
4.5
32.4%
12W–25L · 43.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
73.3%
33W–12L · 56.6% of games
9.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
86 matches
#1 Singles
30%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
29 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King