← Search

Thresa Lampe

— year-end
161 matches · 114W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Thresa Lampe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history161 matches
W
2026-08-12 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carmen Kowalski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-08-05 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mallory Plungkhen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · with Allyson Braun championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
Tammy Been / Sara Delgado
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with Jackie Gehrke championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
Stephanie Miller / Jenny Willis
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Susan Doerr championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Linda Johnson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-09 · Norman, Phyllis · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
Jennifer Allison / LIZ van der TORRE
2026-06-02 · #1 Doubles · with Susan Doerr championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-26 · Norman, Phyllis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexa Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-2
L
2026-05-20 · Gifford, Michelle · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Tawni Bozarth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-17 · HOA/Gifford/55&over9.0W · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Carol Creel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-12 · Norman, Phyllis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexa Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Teams30 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.3% of games
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
84.1%
53W–10L · 65.1% of games
5.0
40%
16W–24L · 44.9% of games
9.0
100%
14W–0L · 70.2% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
14 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer