← Search

Elizabeth Decker

PRAIRIE VILLAGE, KS
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 79W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Decker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
L
2026-08-12 · Chiao, Denise · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-22 · Chiao, Denise · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Denise Chiao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · Schick, Amie · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erin Gustafson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Denise Chiao / Desirae McLaughlin
2026-06-02 · Schick, Amie · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Renetta Ramsdell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ana Lucia Barraza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-3
L
2026-01-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Evelyn Qin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-12-21 · Schick, Amie · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-5, 1-0
L
2025-11-09 · Schick, Amie · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-27 · Chiao, Denise · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Chiao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-20 · Chiao, Denise · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kayla Ruelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-06-17 · Schick, Amie · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Fangman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-06-03 · Schick, Amie · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erin Gustafson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 62.5% of games
4.5
67.9%
53W–25L · 58% of games
5.0
20%
2W–8L · 37.9% of games
9.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe