← Search

Bo Johnson

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 102W–38L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Bo Johnson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
L
2026-09-13 · MAC-Siegel · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christopher Haddon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christie Post mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-01 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Bucher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · Ward-Lawn Chair Legends · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sergio Toledo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Annie Duong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · Ward-Lawn Chair Legends · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sergio Toledo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · Ward-Lawn Chair Legends · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Annie Duong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · Ward-Lawn Chair Legends · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sergio Toledo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · Ward-Lawn Chair Legends · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bryan Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Daniel Larsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Daniel Larsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2013–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
90%
27W–3L · 63.2% of games
5.0
66.7%
16W–8L · 54.3% of games
9.0
71.4%
20W–8L · 58.1% of games
10.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 38.2% of games
9.0mixed
76.7%
33W–10L · 58.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
28 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe