← Search

Amy Bucher

West Linn, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
261 matches · 182W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Bucher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history261 matches
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Thomas Meyer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-09 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brian Board mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-02 · NOR-CRRC-Johnson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Meyer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bo Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-26 · NOR-CRRC-Johnson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gregory Hobi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-24 · NOR-CRRC-Johnson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gregory Hobi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-19 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brian Board mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-05 · NOR-CRRC-Johnson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Koch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-23 · LOTC-Taylor/Ferrer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Green-Zwemke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-17 · LOTC-Taylor/Ferrer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cassia Carpio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-3
W
2026-03-13 · LOTC-Mendenhall/Green-Zwemke · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Green-Zwemke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-17 · LOTC-Mendenhall/Green-Zwemke · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cassia Carpio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2018–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
92%
23W–2L · 71.7% of games
4.0
75%
27W–9L · 61.8% of games
4.5
50%
13W–13L · 50.3% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 58% of games
7.0mixed
71.8%
28W–11L · 60.4% of games
8.0mixed
76.2%
32W–10L · 62% of games
9.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 63.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
104 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
72 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova