← Search

Bob Jurczyk

Saint Charles, MO
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
36 matches · 16W–20L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bob Jurczyk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
W
2026-08-27 · Cash Me Out (Haskins) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judith Connor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-04 · Schultz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Osborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-01-21 · Schultz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Osborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-09-18 · MoValley/Taylor/55&O/6.0X · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irene Schoolfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-21 · MoValley/Taylor/55&O/6.0X · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irene Schoolfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-08-29 · Taylor · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacqueline Hamilton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-22 · Taylor · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Baumgart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-04-01 · STL/Rhoads/65+Over 7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Osborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-03-04 · STL/Rhoads/65+Over 7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2023-05-15 · Good vibrations/Rhoads · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Osborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2023-05-13 · Good vibrations/Rhoads · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Osborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2023-03-21 · STL/Osborn-Kinsella/65&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Osborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
40%
6W–9L · 43.3% of games
7.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 52% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert