← Search

Denise Foley

Wildwood, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
240 matches · 132W–108L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Denise Foley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history240 matches
W
Donna Frazier / Susan Riemann
2026-09-12 · Lemp/Grigg · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Pyatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-23 · The Big Dogs (White/Winn) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyle Darr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-5
L
2026-08-10 · Fridley · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stacey Hilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-09 · The Big Dogs (White/Winn) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyle Darr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · The Big Dogs (White/Winn) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyle Darr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · White/Hardebeck · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Patton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · The Big Dogs (White/Winn) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nick Lammers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-03 · White/Hardebeck · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Whitson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-27 · White/Hardebeck · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Norma Feldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-20 · White/Hardebeck · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Grigg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · Harris (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Orf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · Blake/Reitz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 66.2% of games
3.0
61.4%
27W–17L · 55.2% of games
3.5
51.5%
69W–65L · 50.1% of games
4.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 38.8% of games
7.0
50%
10W–10L · 48.4% of games
7.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
56 matches
#2 Singles
5%
12 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova