← Search

Jeanne Rodgers

Granbury, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 15W–13L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jeanne Rodgers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
W
2026-04-11 · PPL GREGORY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcie Chambers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-04 · PPL GREGORY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcie Chambers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-21 · PPL GREGORY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie McGuire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · PPL GREGORY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcie Chambers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-20 · TCU ALLEN · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tracy Sellers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-01-09 · TCU ALLEN · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandy Beasley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-12-19 · TCU ALLEN · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandy Beasley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Meg Pope / Julie Phillips
2025-12-12 · TCU ALLEN · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandy Beasley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2025-11-06 · PPL GREGORY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie McGuire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-20 · PPL GREGORY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcie Chambers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-09-13 · PPL GREGORY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcie Chambers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-08-09 · PPL MEHALL · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Morawski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
55%
11W–9L · 53.3% of games
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 59.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
4 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer