← Search

Janet Helsel

Bedford, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 23W–30L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Janet Helsel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
W
2026-09-12 · RTC BLACK/BRIGNAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanette Hough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-31 · STC ZAVASKY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ailene Tubbesing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · STC ZAVASKY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casie Couch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-17 · STC ZAVASKY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane O'Mara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-24 · Robinson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cecilia Gallardo Solano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-05-23 · Robinson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Trammell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-05-22 · Robinson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Trammell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-27 · WAG ANDERSON/HOYT · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Fernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-17 · RTC JERNIGAN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judy Zavasky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-13 · WAG ANDERSON/HOYT · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-12 · RTC JERNIGAN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-11 · RTC JERNIGAN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
47.2%
17W–19L · 48.3% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert