← Search

Debra Sanford

Louisville, KY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 7W–42L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Debra Sanford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
W
2026-08-15 · KY/LOU/DAVIS/SANFORD · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Voorhees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-17 · KY/LOU/DAVIS/SANFORD · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marianne Deptola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Jeanne Coffey / Elizabeth Torp
2026-02-13 · KY/LOU/WINEBRENNER · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Kellerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-14 · KY/LOU/STIVERS/MARSH · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dawn McCubbin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-23 · KY/LOU/STIVERS/MARSH · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Malone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-09 · KY/LOU/STIVERS/MARSH · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linnette Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-19 · KY/LOU/Marquette · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Meador mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-08-16 · KY/LOU/DAVIS/SANFORD · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-01 · KY/LOU/DAVIS/SANFORD · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shelley Kinslow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-07-23 · KY/LOU/Marquette · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with James Fox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-09 · KY/LOU/STIVERS/MARSH · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Krawiec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2025-03-01 · KY/LOU/STIVERS/MARSH · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Malone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
25%
3W–9L · 40.6% of games
3.5
9.1%
2W–20L · 34.3% of games
6.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 37.6% of games
5.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 59% of the time
#3 Doubles
59%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal