← Search

Stephanie Kellerman

— year-end
198 matches · 95W–103L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Kellerman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history198 matches
L
2026-09-13 · KY/LOU/JONES · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Curtin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-15 · KY/LOU/JONES · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sharen Hayden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · KY/LOU/DICKS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Sheehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-28 · KY/LOU/DICKS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brittany Burt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-25 · KY/LOU/JONES · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sharen Hayden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-17 · KY/LOU/JONES · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elena Marquette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-30 · KY/LOU/DICKS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Neichter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · KY/LOU/DICKS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Sheehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-17 · KY/LOU/WINEBRENNER · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Winebrenner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-09 · KY/LOU/WINEBRENNER · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-06 · KY/LOU/WINEBRENNER · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
Nancy Jones / Kimberly French
2026-04-18 · KY/LOU/COOK/STEEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamy Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Teams100 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
61%
61W–39L · 53% of games
3.5
26%
13W–37L · 38.9% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
42.9%
9W–12L · 45.8% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.2% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
57 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams