← Search

Floy Pease

Moon Township, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 18W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Floy Pease to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-06-17 · Acing Gracefully · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jan Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-16 · South Hills Hot Enuf · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Madson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-04 · Ageless Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Mathis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-28 · Ageless Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Costa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · Acing Gracefully · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maija Riedel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-1
L
2026-05-13 · Ageless Aces · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Mathis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-5
L
2026-05-12 · South Hills Hot Enuf · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Uffelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-14 · Servivors · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Grafton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Marie Fallek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Lorraine Dees / Kumiko Lancet
2025-08-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Mathis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-08-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Matter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Madson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–6L · 25.3% of games
4.0
10.5%
2W–17L · 35.2% of games
7.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 57.6% of games
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 46.5% of games
8.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 47.9% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer