← Search

Sarah Locher

— year-end
85 matches · 55W–30L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah Locher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-07-16 · South Hills Hot Enuf · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-07 · Glen Creek Vipers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erika McElligott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-05 · Glen Creek GRIT · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelle Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-12 · South Hills Hot Enuf · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Brusco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Brusco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
Linda Trevenen / Kelly Miller
2025-08-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-3
W
2025-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-07-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vicki Donne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-1
W
2025-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vicki Donne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terri Hepps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-12 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams4 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.9% of games
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 60% of games
4.0
55.3%
21W–17L · 52.4% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 56.5% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
15%
13 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova