← Search

Deborah Exley

Easton, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 49W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deborah Exley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
W
2026-06-25 · Swinging Seniors · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elaine Lawrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-11 · Swinging Seniors · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Judy Puchyr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · Golden Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Schwepfinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · Golden Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Schwepfinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-2
W
2026-04-06 · Tennis Fanatics · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elaine Lawrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · Tennis Fanatics · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Louise Bowman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-03-28 · Tennis Fanatics · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shelley Berger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Marcea Hummel / Michele King
2026-03-01 · Tennis Fanatics · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shelley Berger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-5, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · Tennis Fanatics · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elaine Lawrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-09-27 · #1 Doubles · with Tina Test championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-27 · #2 Doubles · with Susan Scott championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-26 · #1 Doubles · with Tina Test championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
7.7%
1W–12L · 29.6% of games
4.0
25%
2W–6L · 41.5% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 51.4% of games
8.0
53.8%
42W–36L · 50.8% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
37 matches
#1 Female Doubles
12%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer