← Search

Marcea Hummel

— year-end
115 matches · 64W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marcea Hummel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
L
2026-06-12 · UD Smash Squad · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with April Torrisi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Legacy Spring 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlene McGrew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-19 · Legacy Spring 40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackie Zivitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-3
L
2026-05-15 · UD Smash Squad · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anh Bixby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-05 · Legacy Spring 40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackie Zivitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-01 · UD Smash Squad · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noelle Finley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-17 · UD Smash Squad · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noelle Finley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-14 · Legacy Spring 40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackie Zivitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-15 · Racquet Scientists · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michele King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-03-04 · Legacy 40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with April Torrisi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-01 · Racquet Scientists · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michele King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-26 · Legacy 18+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackie Zivitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 50.7% of games
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.2% of games
3.5
73.8%
31W–11L · 57.4% of games
4.0
43.1%
22W–29L · 46.1% of games
8.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.3% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert