← Search

Carolyn Andrus

Spanish Fork, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 68W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carolyn Andrus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
W
2026-06-16 · Sunpro-For the Love · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Rowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-12 · SunPro-Parker/Stringham · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-04-28 · SunPro-Parker/Stringham · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Rowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Daniels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-5, 0-1
L
2026-02-26 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Stringham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Ramage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-02-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-4
W
2026-02-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamara Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-12-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Stringham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-6
W
2025-12-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Stringham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Heidi Beckstead / Jamie Harris
2025-12-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with AnnMarie Chadwick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.7% of games
4.0
48.6%
53W–56L · 48.1% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 54.7% of games
8.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
15 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams