← Search

Rebecca Suelzle

BLUFFDALE, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 103W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Suelzle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history170 matches
W
2026-09-08 · SMASH SISTERS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-01 · SMASH SISTERS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with DeeAnna Barlow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
Heather Berger / Natalie Stobbe
2026-08-11 · #2 Doubles · with Tiffany Riley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-30 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Madsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
Jennifer Evans / Lindsay Lafeen
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
100%
13W–0L · 73.4% of games
3.5
58.3%
49W–35L · 53.3% of games
4.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 40.6% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 68.3% of games
6.5mixed
60%
6W–4L · 52.5% of games
7.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 54.2% of games
7.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
21 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe