← Search

Gail Draper

TIMNATH, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
230 matches · 154W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gail Draper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history230 matches
L
2026-09-08 · HMTC RED · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Melody DuPerier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-25 · HMTC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-18 · HMTC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Suzanne Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · HMTC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Linda Jirouskova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · HMTC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tara Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · HMTC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-16 · HMTC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Suzanne Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-07 · HMTC ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Suzanne Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-06 · HMTC ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Suzanne Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-05 · HMTC ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kimberly Tomlinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-05-26 · HMTC YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Berkner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-12 · HMTC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Linda Jirouskova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 57.7% of games
4.0
68.1%
47W–22L · 58% of games
4.5
50%
18W–18L · 53.1% of games
8.0
89.3%
25W–3L · 65.6% of games
9.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.5% of games
8.0mixed
73.5%
25W–9L · 60% of games
8.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
52 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams