← Search

Katherine Lazenby

Westminster, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 103W–31L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Katherine Lazenby to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
W
2026-08-25 · CVTA YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bobbi Billings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-04 · CVTA YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kate Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-02 · RCC RED · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tristan Burm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-28 · CVTA YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kate Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-21 · CVTA YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-12 · RCC RED · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tristan Burm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · with Ark Wang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · with Brandon Solari championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Shawn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · CP BLUE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ark Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Shawn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-12 · NJ GOLD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Shawn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 52.9% of games
4.0
79.7%
55W–14L · 63.1% of games
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 60.3% of games
7.5mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 59.8% of games
8.0mixed
93.3%
14W–1L · 68.8% of games
8.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 60.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
42 matches
#1 Singles
16%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
14 matches
#1 Female Doubles
8%
10 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer