← Search

Arlene Ingraham

— year-end
16 matches · 5W–11L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Arlene Ingraham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
L
2021-08-08 · ESB:BROWN · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aileen Kraus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2021-07-11 · ESB:BROWN · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol Bouyea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Judy Anderson / Sandra Pomeroy
2019-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Annmarie Plant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2019-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Annmarie Plant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Marie Tremblay / Laura Goddard
2019-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Goodrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W
Linda Bracken / Jane Geider
2019-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Loring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
Michele Gilbert / Cailee Laporte
2019-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Alexandra Gonzalez / Linda Senesky
2019-06-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lesli Nichols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2019-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Carolyn Damp / Heidi Vietze
2019-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Feingold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Linn Syz / Suzanne Dellipriscoli
2019-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Lueders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2019-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Teams3 teams · 2020–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.6% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 38% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert